Previous Page  8 / 28 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 28 Next Page
Page Background

V

irginia

C

apitol

C

onnections

, F

all

2014

8

Within the first ten months of the McAuliffe Administration, we

visited Chicago, San Diego, NewYork, London, Japan, South Korea,

Hong Kong and China, twice.

The Governor is “all in” to take Virginia agriculture and forestry

exports to the next level.

Virginia’s agricultural exports continue to be key catalysts in

creating jobs, supporting existing ones, and generating revenue and

other economic activity right here at home.

This continued growth is proof of how important our industry is

to Virginia and why it is important to provide continued support of

domestic development.

Bottom line: the first step is to support our local farmers and

producers.

With the first-of-its-kind Governor’s Agriculture and Forestry

Industries Development (AFID) Fund, we are able to do just that.

In its second year, we have supported 15 different projects across

the state, including 12 focused on agriculture and three related to

forestry.

The AFID program has invested almost $1,450,000 to support the

creation of 1,247 jobs with over $139 million in private investment in

13 different localities.

Clearly, our local producers and farmers are focused on doing

everything they can to help make Virginia the East Coast Capital for

agriculture and forestry exports.

Agricultural producers in all corners of the Commonwealth are

experiencing increased connectivity, importance and role in markets

around the world.

The future of Virginia agriculture and forestry is bright and

we’re thrilled to see what opportunities we can help provide for our

producers.

Virginia Agriculture and Forestry

from page 7

The undisputed truth is there will never be enough money to meet

all of Virginia’s transportation needs, even with the passage of historic

funding legislation in 2013. The economic downturn has reduced

transportation funding by $1 billion. Combined with the uncertainty

of what the federal government will do to fund transportation

infrastructure, Virginia has to be extremely prudent in the way it

selects projects.

My charge as Virginia’s transportation secretary is to make

the best use of public dollars by delivering the right transportation

projects. Governor Terry McAuliffe did not give me a list of specific

projects to build during his term. Instead, he directed me to implement

House Bill 2, legislation passed by the General Assembly this year

that establishes a comprehensive scoring process driven by statewide

transportation needs rather than political whims or executive direction.

House Bill 2 is a significant development in transportation

because—for the first time—law requires a consistent and objective

analysis to score projects according to critical transportation needs.

This process will serve as a valuable tool for the Commonwealth

Transportation Board (CTB) to select projects and be held accountable

for their decisions. Project selection will be more transparent because

the process will be open to the public. You will know how projects

scored and the reasoning behind the CTB’s project selections. There is

no pre-judging of projects. Simply put, House Bill 2 is about funding

the right projects that generate the greatest benefits to the economy

and ultimately our quality of life.

Candidate projects for scoring include key multimodal travel

corridors, regional networks, urban roads, transit, rail and ridesharing.

Critical factors behind project scorings are congestion mitigation,

economic development, accessibility, safety and environmental

quality. The CTB will work with localities to set weights behind the

factors. Projects that reduce congestion will score higher in traffic-

clogged regions in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. For rural

and other regions, scoring may be based on stimulating economic

growth and improving safety.

 The CTB is starting now to identify projects for scoring and place

funding aside so that the board will be ready to officially implement

the process come July 1, 2016. About $416 million in future funding

has been de-allocated from more than 60 projects in the existing Six-

Year Improvement Program. These are not project cuts or delays.

These projects have not started construction and funding was not

allocated until the latter years of the six-year program. House Bill 2

directed the CTB to score these projects. Either environmental studies

were not completed or the projects were not fully funded. Enough

funding will remain on these projects to bring them to a logical

stopping point. Once these projects are

scored, it is possible the CTB could select

them for funding. The projects are posted on

the CTB website,

www.ctb.virginia.gov ,

for

the public to discern why these projects are

subject to House Bill 2.

Projects that are exempt from the

scoring process include pavement and

bridge rehabilitation projects, revenue

sharing projects, projects funded through

the Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads

regional revenues, and certain federal funding categories.

The CTB has started to engage with communities across

Virginia to make people aware of House Bill 2 and to gather input

into the development of the process. I have held nine public hearings

across the state and Deputy Secretary Nick Donohue has spoken to

metropolitan planning organizations and other groups. This outreach

is just the beginning of a much more aggressive effort to inform the

public and get their input on the measures behind the scoring process,

and suggested candidate projects that should be scored. A House Bill

2 website will be set up this winter to share information and public

input. Regional workshops on draft recommendations will be held in

the winter/spring of 2014-2015.

Other key milestones coming up:

• Draft measures for scoring will be presented to the CTB by end of

this year.

• Localities and the public will provide input on measures from

January to May of next year.

• The CTB is scheduled to approve the final scoring process next

June.

• Candidate projects will be selected for scoring next summer and go

through the scoring process.

• Once the projects are scored, the CTB will select projects to be

funded in the six year program that incorporates public engagement.

• The process will be fully implemented by July 2016.

House Bill 2 will help to determine the most critical of

transportation needs through a consistent and clear cut process. Once

this process is up and running, citizens will have the opportunity to

gain a better understanding of the benefits they will receive for their

transportation dollars. Over time, the new project scoring process will

result in better transportation funding decisions, which will ultimately

protect the most precious of resources—our time and Virginia’s

ability to keep the economy moving.

Moving Virginia Forward:

Funding the Right Transportation Projects

By Aubrey Layne, Virginia Transportation Secretary

V

V